-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem: min_gas_price related change is not tested #1264
Conversation
WalkthroughThe adjustments primarily enhance integration test configurations and scripts for a blockchain environment, focusing on gas pricing and fee market modifications. These updates aim to refine the testing of transaction fees, network elasticity, and inter-blockchain communication. The removal of redundant code and the introduction of new testing scenarios suggest a move towards optimizing network efficiency and reliability. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (15)
- integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (3 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc_timeout.jsonnet (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (10 hunks)
- integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (16 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip712.py (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc.py (6 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (3 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ica.py (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ica_precompile.py (5 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_replay_block.py (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/utils.py (4 hunks)
- scripts/.env (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- integration_tests/test_eip712.py
Additional comments: 57
integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (3)
25-31: The addition of
gas_prices
to the validator configuration is consistent with the PR's objective of handling gas prices within the system. Ensure that the value assigned togas_prices
is in line with the network's fee market structure and that all dependent configurations are updated accordingly.103-112: The changes to the
feemarket
configuration, including the newmin_gas_price
field and updated values forbase_fee_change_denominator
,elasticity_multiplier
, andbase_fee
, are significant. It's crucial to ensure that these changes are well-documented and that their impact on the network's fee market is thoroughly tested.103-112: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [25-112]
While the configuration changes appear correct, it is important to ensure that there are corresponding tests that cover the new
min_gas_price
setting and otherfeemarket
changes. This is essential to validate the functionality and prevent any regressions.Verification successful
The shell script output indicates that there are references to
min_gas_price
in theintegration_tests/test_eip1559.py
file. This suggests that there are indeed tests that cover the newmin_gas_price
setting within thefeemarket
configuration. However, the output only shows two lines from one test file, and it's not clear if these are the only references or if there are more comprehensive tests covering the changes.To ensure a thorough verification, it would be prudent to check for additional occurrences of
min_gas_price
and related gas price settings in other test files as well. This will help confirm that the new configurations are adequately covered by the integration tests.
The output from the shell script provides a comprehensive list of references to
min_gas_price
,gas_prices
, andDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
across various files in theintegration_tests
directory. This indicates that the newmin_gas_price
setting and other gas-related configurations are indeed being used and tested in multiple integration tests.The references to
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
and the explicit setting ofgas_prices
in function calls within the test files suggest that the tests are designed to work with the updated gas price configurations. This includes tests for EIP-1559, IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication), and other functionalities.Given this information, it can be concluded that the changes related to gas prices, including the new
min_gas_price
field in thefeemarket
configuration, are covered by the integration tests. This should satisfy the PR's objective of addressing the lack of testing for themin_gas_price
modification.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests that might be covering the new feemarket configuration. rg --type py 'min_gas_price' integration_tests/Length of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for additional references to min_gas_price and related gas price settings in the integration tests. rg --type py 'min_gas_price|gas_prices|DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE' integration_tests/Length of output: 5119
integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1)
- 160-160: The value for
ethermint_dynamic_fee
has been significantly increased. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended fee structure and that all dependent configurations and tests are updated accordingly to reflect this new value.integration_tests/configs/ibc_timeout.jsonnet (2)
5-10: The addition of 'signer3' with an environment variable for the mnemonic is a secure way to handle sensitive information. Ensure that
SIGNER3_MNEMONIC
is properly set in the environment where this configuration will be used.21-25: The update to the
relayer
configuration includes a hardcoded address forfee_granter
. Confirm that this address is intended for testing and does not need to be configurable or secured.integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (15)
15-15: The addition of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to the imports aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.138-138: The addition of a new parameter
grantee
to theprepare_network
function could impact existing calls to this function. Ensure that all calls toprepare_network
have been updated to handle the new parameter.Verification successful
The output from the
rg
command shows the definition of theprepare_network
function, which includes thegrantee
parameter with a default value ofNone
. This means that thegrantee
parameter is indeed optional, and calls toprepare_network
without this parameter are not incorrect.Given this information, it can be concluded that the calls to
prepare_network
that do not include thegrantee
parameter are handling the new parameter correctly, as they are relying on the default value.Therefore, the addition of the
grantee
parameter to theprepare_network
function does not negatively impact existing calls to this function, as they are still valid with the default value.* 154-166: The conditional logic related to `grantee` within the `prepare_network` function introduces a new grant mechanism. Ensure that the grant logic is tested and that the grantee address is properly validated before being used.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to `prepare_network` to verify if they have been updated to include the `grantee` parameter. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'prepare_network($$$)'Length of output: 1701
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the definition of the `prepare_network` function to check if the `grantee` parameter has a default value. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def prepare_network($$$)'Length of output: 406
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the definition of the `prepare_network` function. rg 'def prepare_network' -A 10 integration_tests/ibc_utils.pyLength of output: 312
299-299: The assertion for the fee calculation within the
check_balance_change
function has been modified to useDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
. This change should be reflected in all relevant tests to ensure consistency.336-343: The addition of
gas_prices
parameter to theibc_transfer
function call and the adjustment of related logic is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.361-364: The addition of
gas_prices
parameter to thepay_packet_fee
function call and the adjustment of related logic is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.380-384: The assertion for balance change within the
check_fee
function has been adjusted to account for the newgas_prices
parameter. Ensure that the new logic is tested and that the balance calculations are correct.409-409: The addition of
fees
parameter to theibc_transfer
function within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens
andcronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy
functions is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.447-447: The addition of
gasPrice
parameter to the transaction build within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.468-468: The addition of
gasPrice
parameter to the transaction build within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.486-486: The addition of
fees
parameter to theibc_transfer
function call within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.513-513: The addition of
gas_price
parameter to thedeploy_contract
function call within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.541-541: The addition of
gasPrice
parameter to the transaction build within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.589-589: The addition of
fees
parameter to theibc_transfer
function call within thecronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy
function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.673-673: The removal of the
fees
parameter from theicaauth_register_account
function call within theregister_acc
function could be an oversight. Verify that this change is intentional and does not affect the functionality.Verification successful
The search with
rg
has successfully located the definition of theicaauth_register_account
function within theintegration_tests/cosmoscli.py
file. The function definition indicates that it now accepts a variable number of keyword arguments (**kwargs
). This suggests that the removal of thefees
parameter from the function call within theregister_acc
function could be intentional, as the function has been modified to accept a flexible set of keyword arguments, andfees
could be one of them if needed.Given this information, it seems that the change is intentional and the functionality should not be affected as long as the
icaauth_register_account
function is properly handling the keyword arguments passed to it.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition to verify if the `fees` parameter is still required. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def icaauth_register_account($$$)'Length of output: 415
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Refine the search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition to verify if the `fees` parameter is still required. # The pattern is adjusted to match a function definition more accurately. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def icaauth_register_account($_, $$$)'Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition. rg "def icaauth_register_account" --pythonLength of output: 455
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correct the ripgrep command to search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition within Python files. rg "def icaauth_register_account" -tpyLength of output: 129
integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (7)
- 6-14: The
adjust_base_fee
function now requires aparams
argument. Verify that all calls to this function in the codebase have been updated to include this new parameter.Verification successful
The calls to the
adjust_base_fee
function inintegration_tests/test_eip1559.py
have been correctly updated to include the newparams
argument as required by the recent changes to the function signature.* 17-23: Ensure that the `process` function passed to `crosscheck` is thread-safe and that the assertions within it are valid across different providers.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` without the `params` argument. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_)' # Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` with the `params` argument to ensure correct usage. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 487
- 26-34: Confirm that the
params
structure returned byget_params
matches the expected input foradjust_base_fee
and that the keys and values are consistent with the usage in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
The output from the latest script confirms that within
test_eip1559.py
, theparams
variable is assigned using theget_params
function. This indicates that the structure ofparams
returned byget_params
is indeed the one expected byadjust_base_fee
, as the sameparams
variable is passed to it in the function calls identified earlier.Given this information, we can conclude that the
params
structure returned byget_params
matches the expected input foradjust_base_fee
and is consistent with the usage in the rest of the codebase, as per the original review comment.* 37-77: Review the assertions within the `process` function of `test_dynamic_fee_tx` to ensure they correctly validate the behavior of dynamic fee transactions and that the use of `DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE` is consistent with the intended behavior.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the structure of `params` expected by `adjust_base_fee` to ensure consistency. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, {"base_fee_change_denominator": $_, "elasticity_multiplier": $_, "min_gas_price": $_})'Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` to inspect the structure of the `params` argument. ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, $_)'Length of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the assignment of the `params` variable within `test_eip1559.py`. rg 'params = get_params\(' ./integration_tests/test_eip1559.pyLength of output: 144
80-98: Ensure that the logic within the
process
function oftest_base_fee_adjustment
correctly verifies the base fee adjustment over three continuous empty blocks according to the specification.101-118: Review the logic within the
process
function oftest_recommended_fee_per_gas
to ensure it correctly validates the recommended fee per gas and that the assertions are correct.121-141: Review the logic within the
process
function oftest_current_fee_per_gas_should_not_be_smaller_than_next_block_base_fee
to ensure it correctly validates that the recommended base fee is not smaller than the next block's base fee and that the assertions are correct.integration_tests/test_ibc.py (9)
13-20: The addition of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to the imports inintegration_tests/test_ibc.py
is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.59-59: The introduction of
gas_prices
variable is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.81-81: Verify that the calculation of
paid_fee
usingint(rsp["gas_wanted"]) * gas_prices
is correct and thatgas_wanted
is the appropriate field from the response to use for this calculation.134-140: The
deploy_contract
function is called with agas_price
parameter, which aligns with the PR's objective. Ensure that thedeploy_contract
function definition is updated to accept and use this new parameter correctly.108-108: Ensure that the calculation of
paid_fee
usingint(rsp["gas_wanted"]) * gas_prices
is correct and thatgas_wanted
is the appropriate field from the response to use for this calculation.68-68: Verify that the
transfer_tokens
function is updated to accept and handle thegas_prices
keyword argument correctly.105-105: Verify that the
transfer_tokens
function is updated to accept and handle thegas_prices
keyword argument correctly.139-139: The
gasPrice
parameter is passed correctly in the transaction dictionary. Ensure that the transaction construction and handling in thesend_transaction
function are updated to use this parameter appropriately.115-115: Verify that the assertion
old_src_balance - paid_fee == new_src_balance
intest_cronos_transfer_tokens_acknowledgement_error
correctly reflects the expected behavior when an acknowledgement error occurs.integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (2)
24-24: The value of
diff
has been modified from 0.005 to 0.01. Confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the expected precision for gas consumption assertions in the IBC testing scenario.21-27: The changes in this hunk do not appear to be directly related to the PR's stated objective of addressing untested changes related to
min_gas_price
. Ensure that this change is part of the intended updates for the PR.integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (2)
18-18:
The addition of thegrantee
parameter to theprepare_network
call in theibc
fixture is consistent with the PR's objective to address testing changes related tomin_gas_price
. Ensure that theprepare_network
function has been updated to accept and use thegrantee
parameter effectively.64-64:
The calculation ofpaid_fee
usinggas_wanted
andgas_prices
is a good addition to account for the fee when checking balance changes. Ensure that thegas_wanted
field in the response is always populated and that thegas_prices
variable is correctly set to avoid any runtime errors.integration_tests/test_ica.py (2)
45-45: The addition of
gas_price=DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to thedeploy_contract
function call aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.15-21: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [15-48]
No further issues or discrepancies found within the provided hunk.
integration_tests/test_ica_precompile.py (5)
23-23: The addition of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to the imports is consistent with the changes described in the PR and the AI-generated summaries. This change is necessary for the subsequent use ofDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
within the file.56-56: Setting
data["gasPrice"]
toDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
in theregister_acc
function aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price handling in tests. This change ensures that the gas price used in transactions is consistent with the new default value.112-112: Similarly, the addition of
data["gasPrice"]
in thesubmit_msgs
function is in line with the PR's goal to incorporate theDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
into the test functions, ensuring that the gas price is standardized across different transactions.212-212: The modification of the
deploy_contract
call to includegas_price=DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
in thetest_sc_call
function is correct and reflects the PR's intent to use the newDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
in contract deployment within tests.235-235: The addition of
"gasPrice": DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to thedata
dictionary in thetest_sc_call
function is consistent with the changes made in other parts of the file and the PR's objectives. It ensures that the gas price is explicitly set for transactions within this test case.integration_tests/test_replay_block.py (5)
12-12: The addition of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
to the import list suggests it's being used in this file. Ensure that the usage ofDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
aligns with the new gas price configurations introduced by the PR.38-39: The calculation of
gas_price
usingDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
with a multiplier of 1.1 is a critical change. Ensure that this multiplier is consistent with the intended fee market adjustments and that the calculation is correct and does not introduce rounding issues.38-42: The
gas_price
is now being used in the transaction parameters. Ensure that the rest of the transaction parameters (nonce
,gas
) are being set correctly and that the newgas_price
calculation does not negatively impact the transaction execution.35-42: Review the test case to ensure that the changes made to the gas price calculation do not affect the intended behavior of the test and that all assertions still hold true with the new gas price.
35-42: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [9-42]
While the changes in this file pertain to the usage of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
, ensure that themin_gas_price
related changes, which are the focus of this PR, are adequately tested in this or other test files.integration_tests/utils.py (4)
91-91: The addition of
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
as a global variable is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.350-350: The
deploy_contract
function now accepts an optionalgas_price
parameter, which aligns with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.362-364: The use of the
gas_price
parameter when building the transaction is correct. However, it's important to ensure that all calls todeploy_contract
throughout the codebase are reviewed to either provide this parameter or rely on the default behavior if the parameter is omitted.626-626: The
setup_token_mapping
function correctly uses theDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
when callingdeploy_contract
. This ensures consistency in gas price usage across tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (8)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc_rly.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (5 hunks)
- integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (9 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc.py (3 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet
- integration_tests/ibc_utils.py
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
- integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py
Additional comments: 6
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1)
- 1-21: The configuration changes introduce a new
min_gas_price
field and adjust otherfeemarket
parameters. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended fee market policy and that all dependent configurations are updated accordingly.integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (3)
- 837-852: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [823-851]
The
ibc_transfer
function now accepts**kwargs
and merges them withdefault_kwargs
. Ensure that the merging ofkwargs
does not introduce any unexpected behavior, especially with respect to the precedence of parameters.
- 1535-1541: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1535-1552]
The
pay_packet_fee
function has been updated to include a default kwargs dictionary and additional error handling. Verify that the error handling logic is consistent with the expected behavior of the function.
- 1567-1588: The new
grant
function has been added to handle fee grants. Ensure that the function is tested thoroughly, especially the new parameters like--period
and--period-limit
.integration_tests/test_ibc.py (2)
59-62: The
test_cronos_transfer_tokens
function has been updated to use theDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
constant. Confirm that theDEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
is correctly set and used across all tests.93-96: Similar to the previous comment, ensure that the
DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE
is correctly set and used in thetest_cronos_transfer_tokens_acknowledgement_error
function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (2)
- integration_tests/poetry.lock
- integration_tests/pyproject.toml
Files selected for processing (2)
- nix/testenv.nix (1 hunks)
- scripts/run-integration-tests (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
nix/testenv.nix (1)
- 17-17: The addition of
pyunormalize
with its dependenciessetuptools
andtomli
seems correct. Ensure that the new package is integrated properly wherever necessary in the codebase.Verification successful
The search for the usage of
pyunormalize
in the codebase only returned the instance where it was added as a dependency innix/testenv.nix
. There are no other references topyunormalize
in.nix
files within the repository, which suggests that the package is not used elsewhere in the Nix environment configurations.Given this information, the addition of
pyunormalize
to thenix/testenv.nix
file is verified as correct in terms of its declaration. However, without explicit usage elsewhere, it's not possible to determine if the package is properly integrated into the codebase. The integration and proper use ofpyunormalize
should be verified by the developers who are familiar with the intended use of this package within the project.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of pyunormalize in the codebase. rg --type nix 'pyunormalize'Length of output: 95
scripts/run-integration-tests (1)
- 13-13: The change to run a specific test
test_basic.py::test_basic
in parallel usingpytest -n auto -v -s
is significant. Confirm that this change is intentional and that running this test in isolation covers the necessary scenarios for the PR objectives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (3)
- integration_tests/poetry.lock
- integration_tests/pyproject.toml
- nix/sources.json
Files selected for processing (5)
- integration_tests/conftest.py (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_basic.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc.py (3 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- integration_tests/test_ibc.py
Additional comments: 8
integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1)
- 20-20: Ensure that the
grantee="signer3"
parameter is correctly utilized within theprepare_network
function and thatsigner3
has the appropriate permissions or roles for the tests.integration_tests/conftest.py (3)
6-6: The introduction of
pytest_lazyfixture
should be verified to ensure that the lazy evaluation of fixtures is correctly implemented and does not introduce any unintended side effects.79-83: Verify that the new
cronos_ws
fixture is correctly setting upcronos
to use a websocket and that this new configuration is properly integrated into the test environment.87-98: Confirm that the
cluster
fixture is correctly yielding the parameters provided by the lazy fixtures and that the test setup logic is consistent with the intended test environment configuration.integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3)
33-41: Ensure that the
adjust_base_fee
function correctly utilizes the newparams
parameter and that the logic for calculating the base fee is consistent with the specifications.44-52: Verify that the
get_params
function is correctly retrieving parameters and that the conversion of values to integers is appropriate for the context in which they are used.55-67: Confirm that the conditional logic based on
custom_cluster
within thetest_dynamic_fee_tx
function is correct and that the test is properly configured for different cluster setups.integration_tests/test_basic.py (1)
- 42-47: Confirm that the conditional delay introduced to avoid an "unlock error" when
cluster
matchesgeth
is the best approach and does not introduce test flakiness or other timing-related issues.
Signed-off-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (7)
1-30: The introduction of
custom_cronos
andcustom_cluster
fixtures is appropriate for setting up a test environment with custom configurations. Ensure that these fixtures are used consistently across all tests that require the specificmin_gas_price
setup.33-41: The refactoring of
adjust_base_fee
to use aparams
dictionary for configuration values likechange_denominator
andelasticity_multiplier
enhances the function's flexibility and maintainability.44-52: The
get_params
function correctly handles different scenarios for obtaining parameters, with a fallback to default values. Verify that the conversion from string to integer is safe and that thecli.query_params
method provides reliable and consistent results.55-67: The update to
test_dynamic_fee_tx
to use thecustom_cluster
fixture and adjustmax_price
forcustom_cronos
is logical. Confirm that the conditional logic is correct and that the test's intended behavior is preserved.97-112: The changes in
test_base_fee_adjustment
to use thecustom_cluster
fixture and parameters obtained fromget_params
are appropriate. Ensure that the test logic is consistent with the new setup and that the assertions correctly reflect the intended behavior.116-124: The update to
test_recommended_fee_per_gas
to use thecustom_cluster
fixture is appropriate. Confirm that the use ofcustom_cluster
aligns with the test's requirements and that the assertions are still valid.134-144: The changes in
test_current_fee_per_gas_should_not_be_smaller_than_next_block_base_fee
to use thecustom_cluster
fixture are logical. Verify that the test's assertions remain valid with the new fixture.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (2)
1-14: The import statements and the
custom_cronos
fixture setup are correctly implemented.28-30: Verify that the conversion of parameters to integers in
get_params
does not lead to precision loss if the parameters are expected to be floats.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (2)
- go.mod
- go.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
Additional comments: 7
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1)
- 1-12: The
max_gas
parameter is set as a string. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files.integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1)
- 1-15: The
base_fee_change_denominator
andelasticity_multiplier
parameters are set as strings. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files.integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1)
- 1-21: The
feemarket
parameters (base_fee_change_denominator
,elasticity_multiplier
,base_fee
,min_gas_price
) are set as strings. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files..github/workflows/test.yml (1)
- 22-22: The addition of the
gas
test to the matrix is consistent with the existing test structure and expands the test coverage.integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (3)
47-59: The
adjust_base_fee
function uses string keys to access theparams
dictionary. Ensure that the keys exist in the dictionary and that the dictionary contains the expected types (e.g., integers forbase_fee_change_denominator
andelasticity_multiplier
).67-98: The
test_dynamic_fee_tx
function seems to correctly implement the dynamic fee transaction test. However, ensure that themaxFeePerGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
values are set in accordance with the network's expected behavior and that the test accounts for possible variations in these values.101-116: The
test_base_fee_adjustment
function verifies the base fee adjustment logic. Confirm that the test covers all relevant scenarios, including edge cases where the base fee might increase or decrease unexpectedly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet
- integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet
- integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet
- integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- integration_tests/test_basic.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
integration_tests/test_basic.py (2)
15-15: The import of
Geth
is correctly placed at the top of the file and follows Python's import conventions.46-48: The introduction of a 1-second delay to avoid an unlock error when
cluster
is an instance ofGeth
may be a workaround for a race condition. It's important to ensure that this delay is indeed necessary and does not mask an underlying issue that could be addressed more robustly.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the use of
time.sleep
is present in multiple places within theintegration_tests/utils.py
file, suggesting that introducing delays is a common practice in the test suite to handle timing issues. The specific 1-second delay intest_basic.py
to avoid an unlock error seems to be in line with this practice.Given this context, the delay introduced in
test_basic.py
appears to be a standard approach within this test suite to handle potential timing-related issues. However, it's still recommended to document the reason for such delays clearly and to consider more robust solutions if the underlying issue can be addressed.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if the delay is mentioned in any related issue or documentation. rg --type py "unlock error" integration_tests/Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of time.sleep in the integration_tests directory to understand if using delays is a common practice. rg --type py "time.sleep" integration_tests/Length of output: 517
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make
)make test
)go fmt
)golangci-lint run
)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth
)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores