Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: min_gas_price related change is not tested #1264

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

mmsqe
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmsqe mmsqe commented Dec 18, 2023

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

  • Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
  • Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
  • Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
  • Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
  • Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
  • Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
  • Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
  • Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
  • If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
  • If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
  • If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
  • If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
  • If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new gas price configurations to enhance transaction fee management.
    • Expanded the test suite for improved validation of network transactions and IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) protocols.
  • Enhancements

    • Updated gas limit and gas multiplier settings for better resource management.
    • Adjusted fee market parameters to optimize network congestion handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed issues in integration test cases to ensure accurate network behavior simulation.
  • Documentation

    • Added new environment variable documentation for integration testing.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced existing tests and added new tests for EIP-1559 features and IBC timeout scenarios.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies and scripts to streamline integration testing processes.

@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2023 01:38
@mmsqe mmsqe requested review from yihuang and calvinaco and removed request for a team December 18, 2023 01:38
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Walkthrough

The adjustments primarily enhance integration test configurations and scripts for a blockchain environment, focusing on gas pricing and fee market modifications. These updates aim to refine the testing of transaction fees, network elasticity, and inter-blockchain communication. The removal of redundant code and the introduction of new testing scenarios suggest a move towards optimizing network efficiency and reliability.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet, .../min_gas_price.jsonnet Updated gas price configurations and fee market parameters; added new settings.
integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet, .../ibc_rly.jsonnet Adjusted gas limits and multipliers; removed relayer+ block.
integration_tests/test_eip1559.py, .../test_ibc.py, .../test_ibc_timeout.py, .../test_ica.py, .../test_ica_precompile.py, .../test_replay_block.py, .../test_basic.py Function and test case modifications, additions, and logic changes.
integration_tests/utils.py, .../conftest.py Modifications to function parameters and fixture declarations.
scripts/.env, nix/testenv.nix, scripts/run-integration-tests Added environment variable and package dependency; modified test execution command.
.github/workflows/test.yml Expanded the range of tests to be executed, potentially affecting the overall testing coverage.

🐇✨
In the land of code and byte,
A rabbit hopped through tests of might.
With tweaks to gas and fees in sight,
It leapt towards efficiency's light.
🥕🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • You can reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit.
  • You can tag CodeRabbit on specific lines of code or files in the PR by tagging @coderabbitai in a comment.
  • You can tag @coderabbitai in a PR comment and ask one-off questions about the PR and the codebase. Use quoted replies to pass the context for follow-up questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ee87f0 and f3dea07.
Files selected for processing (15)
  • integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (3 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/ibc_timeout.jsonnet (2 hunks)
  • integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (10 hunks)
  • integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (16 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip712.py (2 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc.py (6 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (3 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ica.py (2 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ica_precompile.py (5 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_replay_block.py (2 hunks)
  • integration_tests/utils.py (4 hunks)
  • scripts/.env (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • integration_tests/test_eip712.py
Additional comments: 57
integration_tests/configs/default.jsonnet (3)
  • 25-31: The addition of gas_prices to the validator configuration is consistent with the PR's objective of handling gas prices within the system. Ensure that the value assigned to gas_prices is in line with the network's fee market structure and that all dependent configurations are updated accordingly.

  • 103-112: The changes to the feemarket configuration, including the new min_gas_price field and updated values for base_fee_change_denominator, elasticity_multiplier, and base_fee, are significant. It's crucial to ensure that these changes are well-documented and that their impact on the network's fee market is thoroughly tested.

  • 103-112: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [25-112]

While the configuration changes appear correct, it is important to ensure that there are corresponding tests that cover the new min_gas_price setting and other feemarket changes. This is essential to validate the functionality and prevent any regressions.

Verification successful

The shell script output indicates that there are references to min_gas_price in the integration_tests/test_eip1559.py file. This suggests that there are indeed tests that cover the new min_gas_price setting within the feemarket configuration. However, the output only shows two lines from one test file, and it's not clear if these are the only references or if there are more comprehensive tests covering the changes.

To ensure a thorough verification, it would be prudent to check for additional occurrences of min_gas_price and related gas price settings in other test files as well. This will help confirm that the new configurations are adequately covered by the integration tests.


The output from the shell script provides a comprehensive list of references to min_gas_price, gas_prices, and DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE across various files in the integration_tests directory. This indicates that the new min_gas_price setting and other gas-related configurations are indeed being used and tested in multiple integration tests.

The references to DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE and the explicit setting of gas_prices in function calls within the test files suggest that the tests are designed to work with the updated gas price configurations. This includes tests for EIP-1559, IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication), and other functionalities.

Given this information, it can be concluded that the changes related to gas prices, including the new min_gas_price field in the feemarket configuration, are covered by the integration tests. This should satisfy the PR's objective of addressing the lack of testing for the min_gas_price modification.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests that might be covering the new feemarket configuration.
rg --type py 'min_gas_price' integration_tests/

Length of output: 207



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for additional references to min_gas_price and related gas price settings in the integration tests.
rg --type py 'min_gas_price|gas_prices|DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE' integration_tests/

Length of output: 5119

integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1)
  • 160-160: The value for ethermint_dynamic_fee has been significantly increased. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended fee structure and that all dependent configurations and tests are updated accordingly to reflect this new value.
integration_tests/configs/ibc_timeout.jsonnet (2)
  • 5-10: The addition of 'signer3' with an environment variable for the mnemonic is a secure way to handle sensitive information. Ensure that SIGNER3_MNEMONIC is properly set in the environment where this configuration will be used.

  • 21-25: The update to the relayer configuration includes a hardcoded address for fee_granter. Confirm that this address is intended for testing and does not need to be configurable or secured.

integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (15)
  • 15-15: The addition of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the imports aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.

  • 138-138: The addition of a new parameter grantee to the prepare_network function could impact existing calls to this function. Ensure that all calls to prepare_network have been updated to handle the new parameter.

Verification successful

The output from the rg command shows the definition of the prepare_network function, which includes the grantee parameter with a default value of None. This means that the grantee parameter is indeed optional, and calls to prepare_network without this parameter are not incorrect.

Given this information, it can be concluded that the calls to prepare_network that do not include the grantee parameter are handling the new parameter correctly, as they are relying on the default value.

Therefore, the addition of the grantee parameter to the prepare_network function does not negatively impact existing calls to this function, as they are still valid with the default value.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to `prepare_network` to verify if they have been updated to include the `grantee` parameter.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'prepare_network($$$)'

Length of output: 1701



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the definition of the `prepare_network` function to check if the `grantee` parameter has a default value.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def prepare_network($$$)'

Length of output: 406



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the definition of the `prepare_network` function.
rg 'def prepare_network' -A 10 integration_tests/ibc_utils.py

Length of output: 312

* 154-166: The conditional logic related to `grantee` within the `prepare_network` function introduces a new grant mechanism. Ensure that the grant logic is tested and that the grantee address is properly validated before being used.
  • 299-299: The assertion for the fee calculation within the check_balance_change function has been modified to use DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE. This change should be reflected in all relevant tests to ensure consistency.

  • 336-343: The addition of gas_prices parameter to the ibc_transfer function call and the adjustment of related logic is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 361-364: The addition of gas_prices parameter to the pay_packet_fee function call and the adjustment of related logic is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 380-384: The assertion for balance change within the check_fee function has been adjusted to account for the new gas_prices parameter. Ensure that the new logic is tested and that the balance calculations are correct.

  • 409-409: The addition of fees parameter to the ibc_transfer function within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens and cronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy functions is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 447-447: The addition of gasPrice parameter to the transaction build within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 468-468: The addition of gasPrice parameter to the transaction build within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 486-486: The addition of fees parameter to the ibc_transfer function call within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 513-513: The addition of gas_price parameter to the deploy_contract function call within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 541-541: The addition of gasPrice parameter to the transaction build within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 589-589: The addition of fees parameter to the ibc_transfer function call within the cronos_transfer_source_tokens_with_proxy function is consistent with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 673-673: The removal of the fees parameter from the icaauth_register_account function call within the register_acc function could be an oversight. Verify that this change is intentional and does not affect the functionality.

Verification successful

The search with rg has successfully located the definition of the icaauth_register_account function within the integration_tests/cosmoscli.py file. The function definition indicates that it now accepts a variable number of keyword arguments (**kwargs). This suggests that the removal of the fees parameter from the function call within the register_acc function could be intentional, as the function has been modified to accept a flexible set of keyword arguments, and fees could be one of them if needed.

Given this information, it seems that the change is intentional and the functionality should not be affected as long as the icaauth_register_account function is properly handling the keyword arguments passed to it.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition to verify if the `fees` parameter is still required.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def icaauth_register_account($$$)'

Length of output: 415



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Refine the search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition to verify if the `fees` parameter is still required.
# The pattern is adjusted to match a function definition more accurately.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'def icaauth_register_account($_, $$$)'

Length of output: 419



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition.
rg "def icaauth_register_account" --python

Length of output: 455



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correct the ripgrep command to search for the `icaauth_register_account` function definition within Python files.
rg "def icaauth_register_account" -tpy

Length of output: 129

integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (7)
  • 6-14: The adjust_base_fee function now requires a params argument. Verify that all calls to this function in the codebase have been updated to include this new parameter.
Verification successful

The calls to the adjust_base_fee function in integration_tests/test_eip1559.py have been correctly updated to include the new params argument as required by the recent changes to the function signature.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` without the `params` argument.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_)'
# Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` with the `params` argument to ensure correct usage.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 487

* 17-23: Ensure that the `process` function passed to `crosscheck` is thread-safe and that the assertions within it are valid across different providers.
  • 26-34: Confirm that the params structure returned by get_params matches the expected input for adjust_base_fee and that the keys and values are consistent with the usage in the rest of the codebase.
Verification successful

The output from the latest script confirms that within test_eip1559.py, the params variable is assigned using the get_params function. This indicates that the structure of params returned by get_params is indeed the one expected by adjust_base_fee, as the same params variable is passed to it in the function calls identified earlier.

Given this information, we can conclude that the params structure returned by get_params matches the expected input for adjust_base_fee and is consistent with the usage in the rest of the codebase, as per the original review comment.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the structure of `params` expected by `adjust_base_fee` to ensure consistency.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, {"base_fee_change_denominator": $_, "elasticity_multiplier": $_, "min_gas_price": $_})'

Length of output: 151



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to `adjust_base_fee` to inspect the structure of the `params` argument.
ast-grep --lang python --pattern $'adjust_base_fee($_, $_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 422



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the assignment of the `params` variable within `test_eip1559.py`.
rg 'params = get_params\(' ./integration_tests/test_eip1559.py

Length of output: 144

* 37-77: Review the assertions within the `process` function of `test_dynamic_fee_tx` to ensure they correctly validate the behavior of dynamic fee transactions and that the use of `DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE` is consistent with the intended behavior.
  • 80-98: Ensure that the logic within the process function of test_base_fee_adjustment correctly verifies the base fee adjustment over three continuous empty blocks according to the specification.

  • 101-118: Review the logic within the process function of test_recommended_fee_per_gas to ensure it correctly validates the recommended fee per gas and that the assertions are correct.

  • 121-141: Review the logic within the process function of test_current_fee_per_gas_should_not_be_smaller_than_next_block_base_fee to ensure it correctly validates that the recommended base fee is not smaller than the next block's base fee and that the assertions are correct.

integration_tests/test_ibc.py (9)
  • 13-20: The addition of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the imports in integration_tests/test_ibc.py is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.

  • 59-59: The introduction of gas_prices variable is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.

  • 81-81: Verify that the calculation of paid_fee using int(rsp["gas_wanted"]) * gas_prices is correct and that gas_wanted is the appropriate field from the response to use for this calculation.

  • 134-140: The deploy_contract function is called with a gas_price parameter, which aligns with the PR's objective. Ensure that the deploy_contract function definition is updated to accept and use this new parameter correctly.

  • 108-108: Ensure that the calculation of paid_fee using int(rsp["gas_wanted"]) * gas_prices is correct and that gas_wanted is the appropriate field from the response to use for this calculation.

  • 68-68: Verify that the transfer_tokens function is updated to accept and handle the gas_prices keyword argument correctly.

  • 105-105: Verify that the transfer_tokens function is updated to accept and handle the gas_prices keyword argument correctly.

  • 139-139: The gasPrice parameter is passed correctly in the transaction dictionary. Ensure that the transaction construction and handling in the send_transaction function are updated to use this parameter appropriately.

  • 115-115: Verify that the assertion old_src_balance - paid_fee == new_src_balance in test_cronos_transfer_tokens_acknowledgement_error correctly reflects the expected behavior when an acknowledgement error occurs.

integration_tests/test_ibc_rly_gas.py (2)
  • 24-24: The value of diff has been modified from 0.005 to 0.01. Confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the expected precision for gas consumption assertions in the IBC testing scenario.

  • 21-27: The changes in this hunk do not appear to be directly related to the PR's stated objective of addressing untested changes related to min_gas_price. Ensure that this change is part of the intended updates for the PR.

integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (2)
  • 18-18:
    The addition of the grantee parameter to the prepare_network call in the ibc fixture is consistent with the PR's objective to address testing changes related to min_gas_price. Ensure that the prepare_network function has been updated to accept and use the grantee parameter effectively.

  • 64-64:
    The calculation of paid_fee using gas_wanted and gas_prices is a good addition to account for the fee when checking balance changes. Ensure that the gas_wanted field in the response is always populated and that the gas_prices variable is correctly set to avoid any runtime errors.

integration_tests/test_ica.py (2)
  • 45-45: The addition of gas_price=DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the deploy_contract function call aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.

  • 15-21: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [15-48]

No further issues or discrepancies found within the provided hunk.

integration_tests/test_ica_precompile.py (5)
  • 23-23: The addition of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the imports is consistent with the changes described in the PR and the AI-generated summaries. This change is necessary for the subsequent use of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE within the file.

  • 56-56: Setting data["gasPrice"] to DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE in the register_acc function aligns with the PR's objective to standardize gas price handling in tests. This change ensures that the gas price used in transactions is consistent with the new default value.

  • 112-112: Similarly, the addition of data["gasPrice"] in the submit_msgs function is in line with the PR's goal to incorporate the DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE into the test functions, ensuring that the gas price is standardized across different transactions.

  • 212-212: The modification of the deploy_contract call to include gas_price=DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE in the test_sc_call function is correct and reflects the PR's intent to use the new DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE in contract deployment within tests.

  • 235-235: The addition of "gasPrice": DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the data dictionary in the test_sc_call function is consistent with the changes made in other parts of the file and the PR's objectives. It ensures that the gas price is explicitly set for transactions within this test case.

integration_tests/test_replay_block.py (5)
  • 12-12: The addition of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE to the import list suggests it's being used in this file. Ensure that the usage of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE aligns with the new gas price configurations introduced by the PR.

  • 38-39: The calculation of gas_price using DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE with a multiplier of 1.1 is a critical change. Ensure that this multiplier is consistent with the intended fee market adjustments and that the calculation is correct and does not introduce rounding issues.

  • 38-42: The gas_price is now being used in the transaction parameters. Ensure that the rest of the transaction parameters (nonce, gas) are being set correctly and that the new gas_price calculation does not negatively impact the transaction execution.

  • 35-42: Review the test case to ensure that the changes made to the gas price calculation do not affect the intended behavior of the test and that all assertions still hold true with the new gas price.

  • 35-42: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [9-42]

While the changes in this file pertain to the usage of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE, ensure that the min_gas_price related changes, which are the focus of this PR, are adequately tested in this or other test files.

integration_tests/utils.py (4)
  • 91-91: The addition of DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE as a global variable is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize gas price usage in tests.

  • 350-350: The deploy_contract function now accepts an optional gas_price parameter, which aligns with the PR's objective to handle gas prices more flexibly.

  • 362-364: The use of the gas_price parameter when building the transaction is correct. However, it's important to ensure that all calls to deploy_contract throughout the codebase are reviewed to either provide this parameter or rely on the default behavior if the parameter is omitted.

  • 626-626: The setup_token_mapping function correctly uses the DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE when calling deploy_contract. This ensures consistency in gas price usage across tests.

scripts/.env Show resolved Hide resolved
integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3dea07 and 2e921e5.
Files selected for processing (8)
  • integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/ibc_rly.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (5 hunks)
  • integration_tests/ibc_utils.py (9 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc.py (3 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • integration_tests/configs/ibc.jsonnet
  • integration_tests/ibc_utils.py
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
  • integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py
Additional comments: 6
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1)
  • 1-21: The configuration changes introduce a new min_gas_price field and adjust other feemarket parameters. Ensure that these changes are consistent with the intended fee market policy and that all dependent configurations are updated accordingly.
integration_tests/cosmoscli.py (3)
  • 837-852: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [823-851]

The ibc_transfer function now accepts **kwargs and merges them with default_kwargs. Ensure that the merging of kwargs does not introduce any unexpected behavior, especially with respect to the precedence of parameters.

  • 1535-1541: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1535-1552]

The pay_packet_fee function has been updated to include a default kwargs dictionary and additional error handling. Verify that the error handling logic is consistent with the expected behavior of the function.

  • 1567-1588: The new grant function has been added to handle fee grants. Ensure that the function is tested thoroughly, especially the new parameters like --period and --period-limit.
integration_tests/test_ibc.py (2)
  • 59-62: The test_cronos_transfer_tokens function has been updated to use the DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE constant. Confirm that the DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE is correctly set and used across all tests.

  • 93-96: Similar to the previous comment, ensure that the DEFAULT_GAS_PRICE is correctly set and used in the test_cronos_transfer_tokens_acknowledgement_error function.

integration_tests/configs/ibc_rly.jsonnet Show resolved Hide resolved
integration_tests/test_ibc.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e921e5 and e9d4736.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py

@mmsqe mmsqe marked this pull request as draft December 19, 2023 07:52
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9d4736 and 0865580.
Files ignored due to filter (2)
  • integration_tests/poetry.lock
  • integration_tests/pyproject.toml
Files selected for processing (2)
  • nix/testenv.nix (1 hunks)
  • scripts/run-integration-tests (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
nix/testenv.nix (1)
  • 17-17: The addition of pyunormalize with its dependencies setuptools and tomli seems correct. Ensure that the new package is integrated properly wherever necessary in the codebase.
Verification successful

The search for the usage of pyunormalize in the codebase only returned the instance where it was added as a dependency in nix/testenv.nix. There are no other references to pyunormalize in .nix files within the repository, which suggests that the package is not used elsewhere in the Nix environment configurations.

Given this information, the addition of pyunormalize to the nix/testenv.nix file is verified as correct in terms of its declaration. However, without explicit usage elsewhere, it's not possible to determine if the package is properly integrated into the codebase. The integration and proper use of pyunormalize should be verified by the developers who are familiar with the intended use of this package within the project.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of pyunormalize in the codebase.
rg --type nix 'pyunormalize'

Length of output: 95

scripts/run-integration-tests (1)
  • 13-13: The change to run a specific test test_basic.py::test_basic in parallel using pytest -n auto -v -s is significant. Confirm that this change is intentional and that running this test in isolation covers the necessary scenarios for the PR objectives.

@mmsqe mmsqe marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2023 01:49
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0865580 and 18b3f59.
Files ignored due to filter (3)
  • integration_tests/poetry.lock
  • integration_tests/pyproject.toml
  • nix/sources.json
Files selected for processing (5)
  • integration_tests/conftest.py (2 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_basic.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc.py (3 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • integration_tests/test_ibc.py
Additional comments: 8
integration_tests/test_ibc_timeout.py (1)
  • 20-20: Ensure that the grantee="signer3" parameter is correctly utilized within the prepare_network function and that signer3 has the appropriate permissions or roles for the tests.
integration_tests/conftest.py (3)
  • 6-6: The introduction of pytest_lazyfixture should be verified to ensure that the lazy evaluation of fixtures is correctly implemented and does not introduce any unintended side effects.

  • 79-83: Verify that the new cronos_ws fixture is correctly setting up cronos to use a websocket and that this new configuration is properly integrated into the test environment.

  • 87-98: Confirm that the cluster fixture is correctly yielding the parameters provided by the lazy fixtures and that the test setup logic is consistent with the intended test environment configuration.

integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3)
  • 33-41: Ensure that the adjust_base_fee function correctly utilizes the new params parameter and that the logic for calculating the base fee is consistent with the specifications.

  • 44-52: Verify that the get_params function is correctly retrieving parameters and that the conversion of values to integers is appropriate for the context in which they are used.

  • 55-67: Confirm that the conditional logic based on custom_cluster within the test_dynamic_fee_tx function is correct and that the test is properly configured for different cluster setups.

integration_tests/test_basic.py (1)
  • 42-47: Confirm that the conditional delay introduced to avoid an "unlock error" when cluster matches geth is the best approach and does not introduce test flakiness or other timing-related issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18b3f59 and 20b9791.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (7)
  • 1-30: The introduction of custom_cronos and custom_cluster fixtures is appropriate for setting up a test environment with custom configurations. Ensure that these fixtures are used consistently across all tests that require the specific min_gas_price setup.

  • 33-41: The refactoring of adjust_base_fee to use a params dictionary for configuration values like change_denominator and elasticity_multiplier enhances the function's flexibility and maintainability.

  • 44-52: The get_params function correctly handles different scenarios for obtaining parameters, with a fallback to default values. Verify that the conversion from string to integer is safe and that the cli.query_params method provides reliable and consistent results.

  • 55-67: The update to test_dynamic_fee_tx to use the custom_cluster fixture and adjust max_price for custom_cronos is logical. Confirm that the conditional logic is correct and that the test's intended behavior is preserved.

  • 97-112: The changes in test_base_fee_adjustment to use the custom_cluster fixture and parameters obtained from get_params are appropriate. Ensure that the test logic is consistent with the new setup and that the assertions correctly reflect the intended behavior.

  • 116-124: The update to test_recommended_fee_per_gas to use the custom_cluster fixture is appropriate. Confirm that the use of custom_cluster aligns with the test's requirements and that the assertions are still valid.

  • 134-144: The changes in test_current_fee_per_gas_should_not_be_smaller_than_next_block_base_fee to use the custom_cluster fixture are logical. Verify that the test's assertions remain valid with the new fixture.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20b9791 and 7eb4226.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (2)
  • 1-14: The import statements and the custom_cronos fixture setup are correctly implemented.

  • 28-30: Verify that the conversion of parameters to integers in get_params does not lead to precision loss if the parameters are expected to be floats.

integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7eb4226 and ed6f4f1.
Files ignored due to filter (2)
  • go.mod
  • go.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
Additional comments: 7
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1)
  • 1-12: The max_gas parameter is set as a string. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files.
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1)
  • 1-15: The base_fee_change_denominator and elasticity_multiplier parameters are set as strings. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files.
integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1)
  • 1-21: The feemarket parameters (base_fee_change_denominator, elasticity_multiplier, base_fee, min_gas_price) are set as strings. Verify that this is the intended format, as numeric parameters are typically not quoted in configuration files.
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
  • 22-22: The addition of the gas test to the matrix is consistent with the existing test structure and expands the test coverage.
integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (3)
  • 47-59: The adjust_base_fee function uses string keys to access the params dictionary. Ensure that the keys exist in the dictionary and that the dictionary contains the expected types (e.g., integers for base_fee_change_denominator and elasticity_multiplier).

  • 67-98: The test_dynamic_fee_tx function seems to correctly implement the dynamic fee transaction test. However, ensure that the maxFeePerGas and maxPriorityFeePerGas values are set in accordance with the network's expected behavior and that the test accounts for possible variations in these values.

  • 101-116: The test_base_fee_adjustment function verifies the base fee adjustment logic. Confirm that the test covers all relevant scenarios, including edge cases where the base fee might increase or decrease unexpectedly.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7eb4226 and a26e7f9.
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py (1 hunks)
  • integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_lte.jsonnet
  • integration_tests/test_eip1559.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price.jsonnet
  • integration_tests/configs/min_gas_price_eq.jsonnet
  • integration_tests/test_min_gas_price.py

@mmsqe mmsqe requested a review from yihuang December 22, 2023 01:48
@mmsqe mmsqe enabled auto-merge December 22, 2023 02:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a26e7f9 and 9ba018c.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • integration_tests/test_basic.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
integration_tests/test_basic.py (2)
  • 15-15: The import of Geth is correctly placed at the top of the file and follows Python's import conventions.

  • 46-48: The introduction of a 1-second delay to avoid an unlock error when cluster is an instance of Geth may be a workaround for a race condition. It's important to ensure that this delay is indeed necessary and does not mask an underlying issue that could be addressed more robustly.

Verification successful

The search results indicate that the use of time.sleep is present in multiple places within the integration_tests/utils.py file, suggesting that introducing delays is a common practice in the test suite to handle timing issues. The specific 1-second delay in test_basic.py to avoid an unlock error seems to be in line with this practice.

Given this context, the delay introduced in test_basic.py appears to be a standard approach within this test suite to handle potential timing-related issues. However, it's still recommended to document the reason for such delays clearly and to consider more robust solutions if the underlying issue can be addressed.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the delay is mentioned in any related issue or documentation.
rg --type py "unlock error" integration_tests/

Length of output: 116



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of time.sleep in the integration_tests directory to understand if using delays is a common practice.
rg --type py "time.sleep" integration_tests/

Length of output: 517

@mmsqe mmsqe added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 22, 2023
Merged via the queue into crypto-org-chain:main with commit e8447a1 Dec 22, 2023
41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants